Defending School Choice in Ohio
Each year, over 50,000 Ohio students participate in one of the state’s five educational choice programs. Two of the most popular programs are the Educational Choice Scholarship Program (the “Traditional Program”) and the Educational Choice Expansion Scholarship Program (the “Expansion Program”).
But now both programs are under attack. On January 4, 2021 a group called “Vouchers Hurt Ohio,” which is composed of a group of public school districts, filed a legal challenge to strike down and permanently enjoin both programs. In the lawsuit, the school districts claim that the programs unconstitutionally divert money from the state’s public schools to private schools.
But the programs do no such thing. Instead, they empower families to direct a student’s state-allocated education dollars to a school that better fits their child’s unique needs. That many eligible families choose to send their children to private schools isn’t a constitutional problem; it’s an indictment of the quality of education Ohio children are receiving at their government-assigned schools.
The Institute for Justice teamed up with a group of families to defend the programs. In November 2023, IJ partnered with EdChoice to form the Partnership for Educational Choice, and together now represent these families.
Background
Over two decades ago, IJ successfully defended Ohio’s first school choice program before both the Ohio Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. In that case, Simmons-Harris v. Goff, the Ohio Supreme Court held that school choice programs were consistent with the state constitution. Rejecting the argument that the Ohio constitution implicitly forbids alternatives to the public school system, the court held that Ohio could provide additional educational options. The United States Supreme Court, meanwhile, upheld the program under the U.S. Constitution in the historic decision Zelman v. Simmons-Harris.
Since Simmons-Harris, Ohio has become home to five school choice programs: the Traditional Program, the Expansion Program, the Jon Peterson Special Needs Program, the Autism Scholarship Program, and the Cleveland Scholarship Program. The constitutionality of these types of programs has been reinforced time and again by state and federal courts across the country, including most recently at the United States Supreme Court.
Clients
In response to the school districts’ lawsuit, IJ partnered with local counsel Emmett Robinson to defend the programs. Now, IJ, EdChoice and Emmett Robinson are representing five Ohio families who either use or want to apply for the Traditional or Expansion Programs. Each of these families wants their children to be in an educational environment that best suits their needs.
The Boggs Family
Christopher and Chelsea Boggs live in Columbus with their three children, each of whom receives a scholarship under the Traditional Program. All three children use their scholarships to attend Tree of Life Christian School in Columbus. The Boggs family prefers Tree of Life because of the school’s strong academics and for the faith-based education it provides.
The Ellis Family
Brian Ellis lives in Akron along with his wife and their three school-aged children, all of whom receive a scholarship under the Traditional Program. The Ellis children use the scholarships to attend Archbishop Hoban High School and St. Augustine Catholic School. With two disabled children who require special attention, Brian is particularly passionate about keeping his children out of their low-performing, assigned public schools.
The Sliwinski Family
Kathryn Sliwinski is a single mother who lives in Columbus with her son, who has ADHD. He uses the Traditional Program to attend Blessed Sacrament School in Toledo, where he benefits from the smaller class sizes and special attention he receives. Without the Traditional Program, Kathryn would have no choice but to send her son to his assigned public school.
The Omelsky Family
Marc Omelsky lives with his wife in Canton, where the two oldest of their four children attend Heritage Christian School using the Expansion Program. It is important to Marc that their children participate in the Expansion Program because Heritage Christian offers their children a better learning environment, stronger academics, and a faith-based education.
The Highley Family
Benjamin Highley lives with his wife in Middletown. The four youngest of their five children attend Middletown Christian Schools using the Expansion Program. There, they benefit from Middletown Christian’s stronger academics and an education that is more aligned with the family’s worldview.
Case Details
Case Name
Columbus City School District et. al. vs. Ohio et. al.
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Original Court
Court of Common Pleas
Current Court
Court of Common Pleas
Date Filed
20220104
Date Closed
Our Other Cases
-
Utah Educational Savings Account Program
Utah Defending the Utah Educational Savings Program People have long come to expect a choice when it comes to their shopping. After all, not…
-
Alaska School Choice
Alaska has a unique correspondence program designed to meet the educational needs of students in this sparsely populated state. A group of parents is…
-
New Hampshire School Choice
Represented by the Partnership for Educational Choice, New Hampshire parents are defending the state’s Education Freedom Account (EFA) program from legal challenge.
-
Tennessee School Choice
In 2019, Tennessee enacted an Education Savings Account that helped thousands of low-and-middle-income students receive a quality education. A year later, the mayor of…